https://mosba.enviseams.com/events/register?id=0686ab83-81c8-ee11-907a-002248046595
This regional School Safety Academy Continuing Education event will feature information on School Resource Officer (SRO) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Development.
Date: Thursday, April 4, 2024
Time: 9:00 am – 12:00 pm
Location: Cape Girardeau Board Office, 301 Clark Street, Cape Girardeau MO 63701
Upstairs Professional Development Room
Credit: 3 Hours of training credit offered for School Safety Specialists
Cost: No Cost to Register
Target Audience:
The target audience is school safety coordinators, school administrators, and police executives responsible for oversight or supervision of a school police program or SROs. Those whose responsibility would be to have input into the generation or evaluation of the school/police MOU document.
Pre-requisite: Review current MOU and bring to class for possible review and comparison to the checklist.
Parking: Free parking is available onsite. Visitors will need to check in at the main entrance. They will then follow signs to the upstairs Professional Development Room.
Topic to be covered:
SRO MOU Development – Mark Riggin, from CES, will present on considerations for a new MOU Relationship or a Revised MOU. An MOU between the school District and the local police department is an essential document outlining each organization’s responsibilities and functions. A well generated MOU will answer many questions on how and when an SRO or police officer will respond in a school setting. The CES’ MOU class will present a basic understanding of a school/police MOU agreement, highlight relevant case law, and review an MOU “checklist” that will cover a wide range of topics and issues that should be discussed when sitting with school police stakeholders during the MOU generation process.
This project was supported by Grant No. 2019-YS-BX-0044 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the Department of Justice's Office of Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the SMART office. Points of view or opinion in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.